Alternatives to the H-1B: O-1A Visa - Alternative Criterion 4 (Judge of the Work of Others)
For those of you considering viable options to the H-1B cap (because you were not selected in this year’s lottery), I will be doing a deep-dive into the O-1A criteria over the next couple of weeks.
When determining whether someone is qualified for O-1A classification, I cannot emphasize enough how essential it is to read the regulations and the requirements in their totality.
What does this mean? Read the regulations and the requirements in their totality. This means literally reading each and every single word – do not summarize or abbreviate the criterion because this is where you get into trouble.
If you do not possess evidence of receipt of a major, internationally recognized award (on the level of a Nobel Prize), in your field of endeavor, you can still qualify for O-1A classification by providing documentary evidence in at least three (3) out of eight (8) alternative criterion, which we will address in the coming weeks.
It is important to note that the vast majority of O-1A recipients that I have worked with (more than 99%) do not have a major, internationally recognized award. These incredibly talented individuals qualify for O-1A classification because they are able to meet at least three of the alternative criterion.
O-1A Deep Dive - Alternative Criterion 4
The regulations state that the beneficiary of an O-1A petition may provide evidence of their “participation on a panel, or individually, as a judge of the work of others in the same or in an allied field of specialization to that for which classification is sought”. 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(4).
Problem
What’s so difficult about this criterion? Why do so many people get it wrong? To satisfy this criterion, you must make a two part showing:
The beneficiary has served, either individually or as part of a group, as a judge of the work of other individuals AND
The work being judged is in the same or related field of specialization/endeavor.
Pro Tips
First, let’s cover what USCIS does not accept as satisfying this criterion. I have never seen USCIS accept service as the leader of a high school science club, mentoring of high school students, judging an elementary or high school writing or essay contest, or judging high school students as satisfying this criterion. While such work is commendable, in order to satisfy this criterion, the work being judged must be produced by individuals at a professional level.
Second, an invitation to judge by itself is not sufficient. The beneficiary must actually participate in the judging of the work of others.
Third, the work being judged must be in the O-1A beneficiary’s field of endeavor or a related field. If the beneficiary is applying for an O-1A as biomedical engineer, and participating as a judge for a food competition, such work would not satisfy this criterion.
So, what would work? Evidence may include but is not limited to: serving as a review of manuscripts, abstracts or articles submitted for presentation at scholarly conferences or publication in scholarly journals; serving as a member of a doctoral dissertation committee; serving as a reviewer for a government research program to determine the allocation of grants or funds; and/or serving as a member of the editorial board of a journal or publication.
Fourth, read the Regulations and USCIS Policy Manual, in particular, “Appendix: Satisfying the O-1A Evidentiary Requirements” carefully and ensure that you are providing documentary evidence that satisfies the entirety of the criterion, not just a summary of what you think it means (or worse, only what you have evidence to show).
Fifth, work with a qualified business immigration attorney who is experienced in representing, preparing and filing O-1A petitions. It is essential to understand the changing definitions, regulatory interpretations and adjudicative priorities of USCIS in order to present the strongest possible petition.